Trending
Celtic News Now
Celtic Quick News on News Now
Celtic Quick News
You are at:»»Celtic v Ross County, Live updates

Celtic v Ross County, Live updates

833
By on CQN BLOG & Comments

Live updates will appear below after 15:00.

Click Here for Comments >
Share.

About Author

833 Comments
  1. Pages:
  3. 1
  4. ...
  5. 12
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. 20
  14. 21
  15. 22

  1. Jobo Baldie on

    As it stands –

     

    CELTIC P 22, PTS 58, GD 47

     

    SEVCO P 20, PTS 53, GD 43

     

    Minis v Tributes in 10 minutes…

  2. Auldheid on

    Sidney Tim

     

     

    SFA reform was always my objective and to all intents and purposes it was one PL seemed to support and the adjournment in 2013 gave shareholders the authority to pursue.

     

     

    If it turns out PL is a barrier to SFA reform then I’ve no problems if to get it, he has to depart the scene although I do understand the pressures under which the 5 Way was signed.

     

     

    Read the interview.

  5. Aipple on

    CANAMALAR @ 5:17 AM

     

     

    Thanks brother. Super weird, usually pretty fit for a class of ’92 type age! Healthcare over here….. One hand on a stethoscope and the other dipping your wallet. Tried to shake me down for my portion of bill while I was still hooked to monitors.

     

     

    Save and rebuild the NHS at all costs!

     

     

    Wanyama signed yet?

     

     

    HH.

  9. sipsini on

    SOCRATES MULLIGAN on 26TH JANUARY 2020 2:40 PM…

     

     

    You would have loved the mass 3 years ago in Lisbon to comemerate 50.

     

    Full of people in the hoops singing Walk on.

     

     

    We’ll done the wee man., 🍀🍀

  10. Auldheid on

    Sidney Tim

     

     

    The Doncaster e mail is genuine

     

     

    It is no more fake as a result of the anonymising of the e mail addresses as the Traverso new club/company letter of June 2016, of which Celtic have a copy, was as result of removal of the address of the solicitor’s firm acting for shareholders to protect the firm from being identified.

     

     

    Surprised such a claim would be made but it is a tactic to undermine the veracity of evidence where it causes difficulties.

  11. Back to Basics - Glass Half Full on

    Auldheid – thanks for updates.

     

     

    Enjoyed, in particular, your post of 3:03pm outlining what the objectives where, and should be.

     

     

    Genuine question (if it is intrusive, please feel free to ignore it)

     

     

    In all of this, what, if anything, is your relationship with Barcabhoy – previously and now?

     

     

    Hail hail

     

     

    Keep The Faith

  13. David66 on

    Guys surely if PL has lied about anything to Shareholders/ fans he has to go? and no I do not know who would replace him but I think there would be a long line of applicants.

     

    There is a lne that should not be crossed. These guys are only custodians of our club.

     

    Surely a vote of no confidence at the next AGM should be on the cards?

     

     

    H H

     

     

    D. :)

  14. Auldheid on

    TURKEYBHOY on 26TH JANUARY 2020 1:02 PM

     

    What would be the final outcome of Res12.,if it were proven that the SFA,had colluded with the then Rangers to grant a licence.Nothing ,I would think.A total whitewash,I would think.A statement from the SFA,saying sorry,steps would be taken to avoid a recurrence of a genuine mistake,made at the time.We hope this puts this matter to bed.For the good of the game.Anyone think differently.?We know there will be no support from the rest of the SPFL,so what could be done?.Nothing,I would imagine.

     

     

     

     

    GFTB is so right when he says many fans only have a passing interest,many,none at all,and only care about what happens on the field.9 and 10,being much more important to them.Have to say,I agree,as just who would be happy with a whitewash and official closure.

     

     

     

     

    Of course if the agenda is to get rid of PL,which many driving Res 12,would obviously welcome as some sort of victory,then that’s a different matter altogether.

     

    ===================

     

    As a shareholder I would be demanding Celtic sue the ass off the SFA for playing a part in denying Celtic revenue and providing it to a main rival.

     

     

    Wouldn’t you?

     

     

    In return for not doing so Id be demanding a set of changes to restore trust and integrity to Scottish football.

     

     

    That would start with setting aside the 5 Way Agreement altogether, revisit how LNS was able to ignore unlawful ebts and ensure deception of any governing body investigation was met by suspension of any club attempting it.

     

     

    However if not enough shareholders, and I mean in numbers not shareholding itself, are happy that their share value is best protected by the current Board policy of covering up wrong doing then the SFA have nothing to worry about.

     

     

    Sectarianism sells.

  16. Philbhoy on

    TURKEYBHOY

     

     

    I didn’t “pick on Taylor”.

     

     

    I was simply highlighting that his lack of game time makes him a waste of money.

     

     

    However, I would suggest that If he can’t get a game before Boli and Hayes, he must be a dud.

     

     

    Now, that was picking on him.

  23. Auldheid on

    BACK TO BASICS – GLASS HALF FULL on 26TH JANUARY 2020 3:39 PM

     

     

    There were a number of mixed messages in the years up to May 2018 when charges were made against TRFC (for crimes of RFC which is a mystery) but only relating to the monitoring period in June and September 2011 under CW.

     

     

    These were a slam dunk btw although CW might claim he was only stating what had been said in March 2011 to obtain the license.

     

     

    The point of limiting the non compliance charges to then were it avoided charging RFC under SDM for breaches, but in Res12 terms meant that any sanction would apply in the following season so shareholders could not claim Celtic lost out in a CL in 2011.

     

     

    However that limitation was challenged by Res12 lawyers in June 2018 using minutes of an HMRC Meeting of 21st March 2011 showing that RFC no longer disputed the liability and sought bank authority to pay it.

     

     

    Thus it was a “payable” at 31st March 2011 subject to UEFA rules Art50 and not a liability under dispute which is not an overdue payable at 31st March under a clause in the Annex to At50..

     

     

    Celtic were informed of those HMRC minutes in May 2018 and again at a meeting in August 2018 with advice on how to deal with them. They did nothing which was the reason for the unhappiness stated at 2018 AGM.

     

     

    The SFA did not respond to the Res12 Lawyers challenge but in July 2018 used a clause in the 5 Way Agreement to park the case in the CAS cul de sac.

     

     

    What has this to do with relationships?

     

     

    It was from that point after June 2018 that all comment on Res12 stopped from sources who until then had appeared supportive here and on Twitter and e mail including Barca.

     

     

    Yet it is all so simple. was the licence in 2011 granted in line with UEFA FFP Article 50 or was deception used to let it happen?

     

     

    That is all Res12 asked to be investigated, yet it has been avoided like the plague, so in early January shareholders asked Celtic to give an answer on deception based on an report from a professional accountant that provided an added reason why licence should not have been granted and if they concurred deception took place, send the report to the SFA.

     

     

    it is all at

     

     

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1koD7VKr3O1Ed1qVIp6zc3kCIYVMfikt-/view?usp=sharing

     

     

    but has been buried by the Doncaster e mail.

     

     

    It is three weeks since Celtic were contacted by a number of shareholders (Sharemans mightbe a good name as tanks were mentioned earlier) but no reply to questions put yet although time to do so was offered to bring the matter to a close. Time I hope that will be used to provide the conditions for moving on.

  1. Pages:
  3. 1
  4. ...
  5. 12
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. 20
  14. 21
  15. 22