Great contracts can sink a manager, Acceptable Use Policy

392

There was a time not so long ago when Jackie McNamara was the next big thing in football management. His fall from a pedestal at Dundee United to inglorious resignation this morning at York City came swiftly, precipitated by the loss of three players to Celtic in 2015.

Stuart Armstrong, Gary Mackay-Steven and Nadir Ciftci were brought to Celtic last year by Ronny Deila. Their departure precipitated United’s fall from competitive a SPL club to relegation candidates a few months into last season, costing Jackie his job in October.

As with a lot in football, there’s more Magic Circle than centre circle going on. What you see happen with players distracts the eye from what’s going on behind the scenes. In April 2015 Dundee United went so far as to issue a statement confirming bonuses were payable to their manager on recent transfers. A manager’s contract is none of our business, it’s exceptional that it was made so, but this gives us an insight into what was going on between the McNamara and United at the time.

Jackie was finished at United from that moment, not that he was blameless. In a few years he took a club brimming with potential and put it on a path to relegation. They will remember him at York City as an unmitigated failure, with few redeeming features.

Resentment brewed at United in the months between Armstrong and Mackay-Steven leaving, and that April statement. He should have left at the time, and should only have made trips to York as a tourist (go, it’s a great city).

His early work at Partick Thistle and United marked him out, but his choice of mentors and collaborators didn’t do him any favours. That United contract worked for him on paper, but it was a burden on his career.  He’ll be lucky to pick up as high a profile a job as Thistle or United, which is a pity, as he’s a better manager than his CV currently suggests.

CQN Acceptable Use Policy

From today there will be two additional eyes monitoring the blog for breaches of our Acceptable Use Policy. They have been asked to delete comments containing aggressive or abusive references to other users. If this is your thing, it’s not what Celtic Quick News is for, so in time honoured manner, take it outside.

Comments must be appropriate for all audiences, which prohibits use of certain language and subject matters.

If your comments are deleted, feel free to take it up with me, celticquicknews@gmail.com . I’ve asked the moderators not to get involved in explanations for their actions, so don’t waste time asking them. If you read anything which appears to break the Policy, please email me.

Moderators are here to help the blog with the occasional intercession, if a user is taking up too much of their time by persistently breaking the Acceptable Use Policy, the account will be suspended.

Thanks for your help going forward.

img_2429-11.jpg

Click Here for Comments >
Share.

About Author

392 Comments

  1. foghorn leghorn on

    so,

     

     

    to draw a conclusion from all of Macjays and MWDs posts this morning,

     

     

    is the assumption to be made that macjay was slagging off the Aussie teams performance in the Japan game because they fought against his beloved fascist Germany in 2 world wars?

     

     

    or i may have read the posts wrong…

  2. macjay1 for Neil Lennon on

    AULD TAM on 11TH OCTOBER 2016 12:18 PM

     

    Macjay –

     

     

     

    Top 2 qualify automatically so shouldn’t be a problem.

     

    ===================================================

     

     

    You wouldn`t have thought so.

  3. Almore

     

    Enjoy your day in the kerrydale cafe lol

     

    Hope all goes well

     

     

     

    Ahjaysuzcsc

     

    :-)

     

    HH

  4. FORD -?

     

     

    This is an interesting/ informative read –

     

     

    Karola Fings et al – Working For The Enemy – Ford , General Motors and Forced Labor in Germany During The Second World War.

  5. The E Tims are in danger of becoming too sensible :).

     

     

    Today they ask questions about intimidation of shareholders

     

     

    http://etims.net/?p=10054

     

     

    but don’t Celtic staff also walk under the same shadow?

     

     

    Is it not time for Celtic to bring the issue into the light?

     

     

    What is their current policy? Do they have one? Should all clubs not have a publicly stated policy on the matter and take responsibility for cleaning out their own houses?

     

     

    Should the SFA/SPFL not be pushing clubs to eradicate this sort of intimidatory behaviour by positive rather than passive means and being demonstrating how they are?

     

     

    Who better to clean up their own houses than the individual clubs themselves but where if anywhere is the pressure to come from if not from the leading club (which means LEAD) in Scottish football?

  6. 67Heaven .. CHALLENGING THE LIE ..I am wee Oscar...... Ipox belongs to the creditors on

    TD67 ….. was it something they said hahahaha …. but you are right, posters need to take what they give …. HH to all

  7. 67Heaven .. CHALLENGING THE LIE ..I am wee Oscar...... Ipox belongs to the creditors on

    Auldheid ….. in what way are shareholders being intimidated by Celtic …. ?