Malky, Craig, redundancies

1217

I got it wrong on Malky MacKay.  In August I wrote, “Malky’s unforgivable sin is not racism, homophobia or anti-Semitism, these matters are often overlooked as ‘banter’, after all.  He’ll not get another job because he blew millions on players who were useless to Cardiff.  That’s the only kind of offence football really tales notice of.”

Then up stepped Dave Whelan, a man who is widely respected in the sports retail and football, largely for not being Mike Ashley, but who has watched his club slip from the Premier League and now sit in a relegation spot in the Championship.

Football is harsh enough without clubs creating their own distractions.  Wigan and Malky are unlikely to prosper.

So Craig Whyte faces up to four weeks in jail if/when he is arrested.  You have to wonder what his police interviews will reveal.  Craig doesn’t strike me as someone to take a fall for anyone.

Redundancies are sometimes necessary for a company losing money and without the resources to pay bills, but Newco Rangers cutting the payroll by 10, none of them from the well paid football department, is pointless tokenism.  Savings made will keep the lights on for only a few days more, so why do it?

I have some sympathy for their new management.  They need to make significant cuts into football costs, but those costs are contracted to the end of the season, or beyond, these cuts are perhaps a gesture towards what’s ahead.

Management have a problem, how do they meet commitments to creditors and protect shareholder value?  No bank has ever extended credit to this club, and I suspect HMRC have them on a short leash.  There will be some trade creditors, but they are likely to be of the face painter variety.  By far the biggest creditor, and therefore most influential after an insolvency event, is Mike Ashley.  He would be in a position to appoint an administrator, and to approve any settlement.

Dave King continues to play an important role, encouraging fans not to support or spend with the club.  I fully endorse his views.

King still thinks he is playing poker but his hand has been called and we all know he’s all out of aces.  His rantings are not part of a coherent plan.  His calls could precipitate the end, but he has no way of transforming this into a new dawn.

Remember to keep an eye on the long-term fundamentals, you cannot operate a large football club with the size of Newco’s infrastructure without regular Champions League income.  Nothing that has happened in the last three years has changed this.

Click Here for Comments >
Share.

About Author

1,217 Comments
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 32

  1. The Battered Bunnet on

    Natknow

     

     

    RIFC claim ownership of them, so they’re included in the books.

     

     

    Worthington dispute this, and the auditors include an Emphasis of Matter statement in the accounts drawing attention to the material uncertainty over the outcome.

     

     

    RIFC can claim title to the assets until a court tells them otherwise.

     

     

    BTW The Land Registry has a definitive status as regards ownership. The registry (as I recall) confirms RIFC as having title. In the event that a court nullifies the original transaction, the assets won’t (necessarily) belong to some other party, but RIFC will be required to compensate the other party accordingly.

  2. Didn’t big hands flash a piece of paper at the smsm claiming it was the deeds for ipox?

     

     

    I might be wrong, as is usually the case.

  3. Happy Families at Ibrox – episode number 4,892

     

     

    15:28: Easdale ‘wanted personal assurances’

     

     

    Richard Wilson BBC Scotland Sandy Easdale, chairman of the Rangers football board, sought assurances that boardroom changes would not force him out of Ibrox, Dave King has revealed.

     

     

    During discussions about a proposed £16m investment by King and a Rangers fans’ consortium, he wanted reassurance that his position was safe.

     

     

    He was advised there was “no immediate intention to remove him or his brother [James] from the board”.

     

     

    Sandy Easdale subsequently supported Mike Ashley’s offer of a £2m loan.

  4. The Battered Bunnet

     

     

     

    15:28 on 20 November, 2014

     

     

     

    Natknow

     

     

    RIFC claim ownership of them, so they’re included in the books.

     

     

    Worthington dispute this, and the auditors include an Emphasis of Matter statement in the accounts drawing attention to the material uncertainty over the outcome.

     

     

    RIFC can claim title to the assets until a court tells them otherwise.

     

     

    BTW The Land Registry has a definitive status as regards ownership. The registry (as I recall) confirms RIFC as having title. In the event that a court nullifies the original transaction, the assets won’t (necessarily) belong to some other party, but RIFC will be required to compensate the other party accordingly.

     

    —————————————————————————–

     

    Thanks TBB – clear explanation as usual.

     

     

    I’ll let you get back to your bromance… ;-)

  5. nothing without fans on

    Gordon_J

     

     

    Surely even young Fleck would have known better than that.

     

     

    Unfortunately the the Sunday Mail story referenced seems to have been removed.

  6. Burning_Bush

     

     

     

    15:24 on 20 November, 2014

     

     

     

    Natknow – precisely my point and the source of my confusion.

     

    ————————————————–

     

    ‘Twas a good question dude…

  7. The Battered Bunnet on

    Natknow

     

     

    Ask PF Ayr about the way the Land Registry (RoS) statutory guarantee works.

     

     

    Essentially, if your name in on the title to a property, you – and the rest of us – can “absolutely rely upon it”.

     

     

    Must be plenty of situations though when title is disputed after registration, and I’ve no idea what happens or what the remedies are.

     

     

    Chap like PF of course will have it all down off pat :¬)

  8. mike in toronto on

    G’day,

     

     

    I’m practicing my australian for my upcoming (dec 22 – Jan 8) trip to australia. I will be in sydney and newcastle.

     

     

    I looked on Celtic bars, and saw that the Hunter Valley CSC is based in the Stag and Hunter Hotel in Newcastle. But when I clicked on the link, it didn’t work. Does anyone know if there is still a CSC in Newcastle?

     

     

    lookingforwardtoxmasonthebeachCSC

  9. mike in toronto on

    since no one else seems to be on, I’ll go for a hatrick

     

     

    boredwhilewaitingforaclientwhoislateCSC

  10. Toronto Mike …looked at that twice …first time I thought you were going to be dtoxing with a mason!!!cfc

     

     

    braw

  11. Mike in Toronto

     

     

    I have a Celtic friend in Newcastle – will check with him and let you know. Give me a few days.

     

     

    Australian is easy – English with every 3rd word a swear word.

  12. mike in toronto on

    NB …

     

     

    LOL

     

     

    Based on that, I’m thinking that, if me and the mason do decide to go to detox, you’ll be joining us?

  13. mike, just go to the irish club, home of the tyneside csc.

     

     

    brilliant people and a great club

  14. Jungle Jim Hot Smoked on

    NB

     

    I had a problem, too. I thought Mike was looking forward to kissing a mason on the beach 0:-) !

     

     

    JJ

  15. mike in toronto on

    Jim

     

     

    Cheers.

     

     

    I have noticed that … and every second work is ‘yeah’… makes me laugh

     

     

    but KT and I watched Riff Raff (an old Robert Carlyisle film about workers on a job site in London) … she couldn’t even understand half of what was said, so I probably shouldn’t laugh too much at the aussies!

  16. mike in toronto on

    Jungle Jim

     

     

    I can already hear the chant going around Celtic park … ‘who kissed the mason in the black?’ …. I’m going to be famous.

  17. Re: LiviBhoy’s Andre Agassi tale, I have long thought that if our players were as fit as the top tennis pros we would steamroller opposition on a regular basis.

  18. Calling all CQN music fans

     

     

    I’ve got two tickets I can’t use for the Jesus and Mary Chain gig at Barrowland this Sunday. £30 each. If anyone is interested pop a response on here and I’ll check in later.

     

     

    HH

  19. mike in toronto on

    IPaddy

     

     

    I’m jealous … I still have a bootleg tape of a few of their shows from their first tour … brilliant… and Never Understand and Sometimes Always …. two of the greatest singles ever!

  20. mike in toronto on

    Saint Stivs

     

     

    There are a few bloggers who scare me a little bit …. after last night, not sure I want to be bothering macjay at the moment :)

     

     

    Hrvatski Jim

     

     

    It would be a steal at even twice the rate!

  21. Bognor

     

     

    Thanks for your help earlier. Re ticket for Fir Park. I got in touch with HT. Sorted.

  22. A fiver for your thoughts on

    NatKnow

     

     

    15.38 on 20th November, 2014

     

     

    The Battered Bunnet

     

     

    15.28 on 20th November, 2014

     

     

    Guys,

     

     

    If indeed Worthington Group is successful in their challenge for ownership and as a result RIFC were required to compensate the other party as you suggest, would this not open a claim by Ticketus since I was always convinced that Ticketus would not have advanced £18 M to CW without requiring a security over Ibrox and/or Murray Park?

  23. mike in toronto on

    Kitalba

     

     

    I was only jokling about macjay. I am sure he is good company. I have yet to meet a CQN’er who hasn’t been.

  24. jungle jim hot smoked

     

     

    16:36 on 20 November, 2014‘who kissed the mason in the black?’ …It`s a secret.

     

    geeza kiss and i’ll tell ye x

  25. The Battered Bunnet on

    A Fiver

     

     

    Nope. The assets were ‘sold’ in liquidation. The Ticketus claim, whatever it is, stays with the Oldco, with the Liquidators, and they’ll get their dividend in due course.

     

     

    The Newco problem (in part) is based on the legitimacy of the sale, not any outstanding claims to the title which were void on liquidation.

  26. A fiver for your thoughts on

    The Battered Bunnet

     

     

    16.43 on 20 November, 2014

     

     

    Thanks, my head’s hurting working it out, I had assumed that if the legitimacy of the sale was successfully challenged then the ownership and assets would return to CW/Worthington Group.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 32