Rangers, the biggest scandal in the History of Sport and the rest

856

Perspective is difficult to find in these times, when information floods in from all angles on a daily basis. With this in mind, The Battered Bunnet put a day aside to give you a detailed summary (below) of how we go to where we are today. He pays particular attention to some of those who plan to be part of the game’s future, with a nod to those currently in control of the game.

It’s a fascinating read:

Scottish Football is in crisis, a crisis that has been 15 years in the making by the Directors of Rangers Football Club plc, compounded by a chronic lack of Governance and Oversight by the cronyistic SFA through the years.

Let’s revisit the cause of the crisis for a moment:

When David Murray bought Rangers in 1988, the club had won but 4 league titles in 20 years, and prior to the arrival of Graeme Souness, had been a Scottish League also ran for a decade. Souness, with David Holmes as Chairman, started the reversal of fortune and effectively restored Rangers as a player in British football.

Murray, giving credit where it’s due, transformed Rangers both as a football club and a business. Between 1988 and 1996, Rangers’ turnover increased by a factor of 5, double double and then some in only 8 years. During this time, the club became dominant in Scotland and competitive in Europe, while considerable sums were invested in the stadium and infrastructure, providing Rangers with a (comparatively) vast commercial resource to fund its football operations. While the club carried £9M of debt at this point, it was profitable, posting £2M surplus in 1996, and breaking even over the period of Murray’s tenure to that point.

By 1996 Murray had a valuable football business on his hands, and perhaps the smart play would have been to sell it. Football was in an expansionary phase, and there would have been a queue of interested and well bankrolled investors at the door. Instead, Murray chose to redouble his efforts, and taking Rangers ‘to the next level’ became the mantra adopted by the man and his increasingly fawning press.

Highlighting that Murray was not alone in thinking that Rangers could indeed become one of Europe’s top clubs, the following year Joe Lewis invested £40M in return for a 20% share. One wonders what Murray might have walked away with had he sold the lot to Lewis at that time, but he kept his hand in the game, and went all in over the following 6 years.

Between 1997 and 2003 Rangers lost an eye watering £152.6 Million. Joe Lewis’ £40M was gobbled up in jig time, followed by £20M of Dave King’s tax efficient stash, plus a £32M investment by Murray’s business, £6M from smaller shareholders, and a further £15M of NTL’s investment in the hopeless Rangers Media venture. At its nadir in 2004, Rangers net debt was a staggering £83 Million, a monument to the ego of David Murray and his ‘dream’ for Rangers.

Unfortunately, burning shareholders’ and creditors’ cash at such a breath-taking rate was not sufficient to fund Murray’s project, and the club embarked upon a series of schemes to pay players and reduce costs. A Discount Option Scheme saved over £2M between 1999 and 2003, while an Employee Benefit Trust framework saved £45M of payroll tax and gross wages between 2000 and 2010. It is worthwhile noting that the cost savings alone from these schemes gave Rangers a financial advantage equivalent to the total payroll of every other SPL team excluding Celtic.

We know now, thanks to the admissions of former director Hugh Adam, that ‘off the books’ payments to Rangers players had started as early as the mid-1990s, and the DOS and EBT schemes were simply formalising a by then established practice.

By 2005, with Rangers reduced to little more than a financial basket case, Bank of Scotland insisted that the club be brought back into balance, and following a failed public share issue, Murray’s holding company swapped £50M of Rangers’ debt for increased equity. The following year JJB paid £15M cash as a future royalty for a 10 year solus agreement on Rangers merchandise. Murray might very well have sold the jersey, but Rangers at long last had gotten rid of all but £6M of debt, and a new ‘sustainable’ plan was implemented, a plan that endured no longer than Paul Le Guen’s 26 games in charge.

When Walter Smith replaced Le Guen, the new plan was binned and Rangers once again embarked upon a ‘front loaded’ business model, with debt increasing on the back of player purchases and wages that the club could not sustain. By 2009 Rangers had £33M of bank debt and Murray’s companies, so long the guarantor of the funding, had utterly collapsed in the property and construction crash of 2008. It is worthwhile remembering that some £70 Million of Rangers’ losses through the years remains on the Murray International Holdings Ltd balance sheet, unpaid to the part-nationalised Bank of Scotland/Lloyds Banking Group.

Early in 2010, following an unusually long Tax Enquiry, Rangers received a Tax Assessment from HMRC for their use of EBTs in the preceding 10 years. The Bill for £24M, had a further £12M of accrued interest attached, and the promise of penalties to come.

Alastair Johnston, who had replaced Murray as Chairman of Rangers following the crash of Murray’s business empire, had a decision to make. In the summer of 2010, £36M tax demand in hand, and an appeal against which scheduled for October, Johnston was planning the coming season’s business. He could have chosen to sell the top footballers which would have brought in around £20M of proceeds. He could have chosen to run the club on a reduced cost model, one that was profitable on domestic football alone, thereby banking a further £20M from their participation in the Champions League. Had he done so, and ring fenced the cash, Rangers would have been in a position to withstand losing the Tax Case Appeal without bankrupting the club.

Alastair Johnston and his Board chose not to. He chose instead to spend money increasing the size of the squad, with £4M spent on Jelavic alone. Whatever else you hear about Rangers’ sorry plight, remember that in the summer of 2010 Alastair Johnston and his Board decided to prioritise football results ahead of the very existence of the club. That was the last time that Rangers’ fate was in the hands of the Club. From the moment the decision was taken not to act, Rangers’ fate was sealed.

Craig Whyte’s bizarre 9 month tenure of course is attracting all of the headlines, and Murray’s reckless disregard for shareholders and laws have precipitated the crisis, but Alastair Johnston, along with Paul Murray, Martin Bain, John McClelland and the rest doomed the club by their inaction in the summer of 2010.

We are now aware that Rangers’ use of unlawful tax strategies had a consequent impact on the proper Registration of their players. I won’t pour over the relevant rules here, suffice to say that in making payments to players via undisclosed agreements that were not provided for in the football contracts lodged with the authorities, many of Rangers top players have been ineligible to play in official matches for a decade or more.

As if it couldn’t get any more damning, the very Directors of Rangers who conceived, implemented and administered these contractual arrangements, were simultaneously Directors of the SFA and the SPL, the bodies responsible for Governance and Oversight. Step forward John McClelland, Martin Bain and Campbell Ogilvie. That Ogilivie is currently President of the SFA simply beggars belief. It appears as though Football in Scotland has been bent for 2 decades, and the people responsible were running the game.

There is a current SPL Inquiry into this issue, and perhaps that will reveal the true extent of the breaches of rules, but from the information now available in the public domain, there is a prima facie case for voiding the results of hundreds of matches in which Rangers have participated over the years, and stripping the club of any titles won during the period. The expulsion of the club from the game is talked of. In terms of athletes and duration, it represents a bigger sporting fraud than the Balco case, and is on that basis, the biggest scandal in the History of Sport.

Did I say a ‘moment’? Forgive me, but it has taken a little while to describe 15 years of malfeasance and deception.

In summary, in the 15 years from 1996 to 2011, Rangers have spent a staggering £168 Million more than they have earned. They have saved a further £47 Million of payroll costs via the use of questionable tax strategies. They have corrupted the rules of the game from the inside. And now they are bankrupt, with the very real prospect of £100 Million of creditors being turned over in one of the biggest corporate failures in Scottish business history.

Against this backdrop, Scottish Football has to divine the way ahead. We have to figure a way out of this mess and build a new future. Everything must be on the table, everything that is except narrow self-interest.

Following a Liquidation, if a group of supporters of a dissolved Rangers get together and start a new football club, one that looks like and sounds like Rangers, playing in blue shirts at Ibrox or elsewhere, I say good luck to them. Of such like-minded people are Football clubs are born. There is clearly a business opportunity given the size of the support for the old club. The pathway is straight forward: Put a Business Plan together; Invest the necessary Capital; and Apply for membership of the Scottish Football League. If the club prospers on the park they will be rewarded with promotions and will emerge into the top flight in their own merits, self-respecting and respectful. Such qualities does Meritocracy provide.

That is a decision though for Rangers supporters. The rest of us need to figure out a new plan. Without Rangers there will inevitably be less money in the top league, fewer fans perhaps, less TV and sponsorship money. We need to accept that reality and respond to it.

I suggest we look towards Cooperation, Collective Interest, Inter-Dependence.

The hardest hit will be those clubs most reliant on the money lost. Redistribution of TV income should be considered. No question.

Youth Development should be looked at again, not least because for most clubs it will define their future. Closer cooperation amongst the clubs can yield benefits for both clubs and players. A modified Draft system might be appropriate, whereby players graduating from Under 19/20 are available to be signed by other clubs in a predetermined sequence, perhaps with the developing club having a first option on 2 players, the remainder co-opted into the draft.

Considering Celtic’s worldwide scouting network, is there potential to share information on overseas prospects with the other clubs? An easy thing to implement.

Looking at income, the huge imbalance created by the participation fees paid to clubs qualifying for the Champions League distorts domestic competition. Can we consider a distribution to all clubs of Marketing fees and likes from UEFA for our clubs’ participation in UEFA competitions?

Finally, what other means do we have, given the collective talent and resources of the top clubs in Scottish Football, to generate new opportunities, new market share, new income? If necessity is indeed the Mother of Invention, we are not short of need. Let’s get innovative.

Of course, all of this is based upon a consensual approach to the crisis we face. It is widely reported that the other 10 clubs in the SPL are meeting next week to consider an appropriate response to the problems we all face. Celtic have not been invited to attend. This in itself is a concern, as it draws something of a line in the sand between the interests of the 10, and the interests of Celtic. One SPL chairman told BBC Scotland: “This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change things.” Such change, hatched by the 10 other clubs and forced upon Celtic is not a cooperative approach.

Moreover, Celtic are by a distance the biggest box office in the league. This season attendance at Celtic Park equates to 72% of the total attendances at all other grounds excluding Ibrox. A series of decisions on restructuring the SPL and redistributing the proceeds from the competition that excluded the stakes of almost half of the fans in the league is surely invalid.

Quite what will these clubs do with their self-acknowledged ‘once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to change things’?

Perhaps the 10 SPL Clubs will come up with some truly radical and forward looking ideas that are at face value, innovative, imaginative and laudable.

Perhaps though they won’t. Perhaps their ideas will be a little more self-interested. That is certainly the form book in Scottish Football.

Redistribution of SPL TV and Sponsorship income that excludes the Champion team from the divvy? Why not eh. The 10 Clubs will have the SPL voting majority to do so.

What would the implications be should the 10 Clubs decide that gate sharing was the way ahead for the SPL? Certainly, in the absence of Rangers, they would carry the voting rights to approve such a decision, irrespective of any objections from the fans whose money would be redirected.

And indeed, the admission of a New Rangers directly into the SPL, bypassing all meritocratic and long established practices in the game worldwide.

Establishing a new business is a challenging activity. Doing so in the midst of the financial chaos enveloping Rangers is utterly fraught. Those considering such a move need to have confidence in revenue projections and market. In the case of a New Rangers, the arbiter of revenue is the League they will participate in. It is reasonable to assume that informal soundings have been taken by those considering a New Rangers project from those with the power to determine which market they will operate in.

I have no problem with Stephen Thomson of Dundee Utd picking up the phone and chatting to Stewart Milne of Aberdeen. Indeed, I would expect it in the ordinary course, never mind the crisis we all face. However, given the likelihood that those behind a New Rangers are right now making their initial pitch to each of the 10 clubs, it is somewhat distressing that those same 10 clubs should in short course arrange a meeting to discuss and plan the way ahead, excluding Celtic and the interests of half the remaining fans of the SPL.

Paul Murray, Martin Bain, John McClelland, Alastair Johnston, Dave King: The men who brought this disaster down upon the game in this country, who corrupted the game from the inside for a decade or more, who burned £100 Million of creditors money, who are responsible for ripping off the Tax Payer and the Football Fan alike, who failed to act on Rangers’ crisis when action was most needed, these men and their likes are currently negotiating with the 10 Clubs the conditions for the entry of New Rangers directly back into the SPL.

The very essence of Sport, the history of Football, and the future of the Game in this country is to be decided in the coming weeks by the chairmen of just 10 Clubs. In the hands of these men is the legacy of the game accidentally entrusted, and its future precariously placed.

At our moment of crisis, when wisdom and consensus are most needed, what direction will they take? Where will Scottish Football go from here?

To a new, mature, responsible and progressive place? Or to Hell in a Handcart.

Click Here for Comments >
Share.

About Author

856 Comments
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 23

  1. Paul67

     

     

    This gate sharing, So if 60,000 show up at Celtic Park the rest of the clubs get the money?

     

     

    To be honest I disagree with EVERYTHING The Battered Bunnet has suggested regards restructuring in the SPL.

     

     

    So Killie get to wipe out their £10 Million debt, off our fans, our CL Money, our scouting network, basically our years of getting the house in order is just given away to bail out these short sighted wasters.

     

     

    F*** that!

     

     

    Rather see the game in this country die than that happen.

     

     

    HH

  2. TBB

     

     

    A very succinct summary of a lengthy period of turbulence and deceit.

     

     

    Those pointy shoes you wore at the Music Quiz night obviously squeezed all the blood out of your feet and it headed upwards to enrich your brain and thought processes.

     

     

    We should send it out as a press release

  3. kitalba,

     

     

    My apologies for not answering you sooner. I have been out all day, celebrating with my auld Dad. His dearest birthday wish to is to hear of their demise. Hopefully, it will occur shortly.

  4. 67Heaven ... I am Neil Lennon..!!..Truth and Justice will always prevail on

    Jabba etc think most Celtic fans want competition before trebles….!!!! …and they are wondering why PL thinks we can stand alone………what a load of old shoite ….they don’t know us at all….

  5. tommytwiststommyturns on

    Leggo is a delusional fool, but a dangerous one. Identifying the hotels used by the administrators could lead to them being physically intimidated.

     

    Maybe someone should post details of Leggo’s favourite watering holes on the various Celtic websites?

     

     

    TTTT

  6. Celtic fan on Jabbas show saying he wants a competitive huns. Also states that he bought a Rangers(IA) dvd of 9IAR because Celtic were so crap during that time. Would any Celtic supporter ever contemplate such behaviour ?

  7. Paul67 et al

     

     

    One of the problems in modern society is that people who recklessly lend other peoples money are given bonuses while those recklessly borrow that money are given knighthoods. The former of course includes Peter Cummings, former Managing Director of the Corporate division of the HBOS, and the man who destroyed the Bank of Scotland, whilst amongst the latter is Sir David Murray knighted for services to business, one of which was bankrupting Rangers Football Club.

     

    The Bank of Scotland under Cummings were in bed with Murray and with Rangers FC. Cummings was the enabler, and Murray was one of those referred to in a damning FSA report as a “single name”. If you think that has a certain masonic ring to it, then you would be correct in thinking so.

     

    The Battered Bunnet has shown us, once again, the context of Rangers’ downfall, of the price of buying success, and of the choices it leaves those in control of the SFA, SPL and the SFL. If they choose wrongly, and I am not convinced they will, then Scottish Football needs to start from scratch!

  8. My dear,dear,dear,friend…The Battered Bunnet.

     

     

    Ye Did a Hellava Joab..in recounting the Inexorable Succession

     

    o’ Fatal. Steps..

     

    which hiv Led this wance Proud Enterprise.. intae the

     

    Financial Morass.. where it ..tae it’s utter Horror…it Finds itsel..the Day!

     

     

     

    Mebbe,No yer.. Magnum Opus, pally…. but,

     

    it Soitenly , Must be considered…. a Contendah!

     

     

    Ah AM .. Impressed!

     

     

    Great,pal…

     

     

    Ye dae Guid woik!

     

     

    Kojo

  9. ASonOfDan on 10 March, 2012 at 17:38 said:

     

    To be honest I disagree with EVERYTHING The Battered Bunnet has suggested regards restructuring in the SPL.

     

    ======

     

    Agree 90% the only concession we should consider would be a new model for the distribution of TV revenue which would include a percentage of revenue from European ties. An absolute no to any sharing gate receipts or advertising income.

  10. Barcabhoy:

     

     

    I agree but right now, at 2500 words, it’s six pages haha.

     

     

    A truly remarkable piece of work.

     

     

    share

     

     

     

    ———–

     

     

    6 Pages on the most important issue facing Celtic since 1994 isn’t overkill, it’s the least the scandal deserves.

     

     

    In fact it would be a great idea to have an entire edition of the magazine devoted to the subject

     

     

    Plus a book, plus a video, …..all from a Celtic perspective. fans, bloggers, ex players ex directors shareholders…….combine the current scandals with footage and anecdotes and you have an explosive subject matter

     

     

    The potential here is enormous, and it will be a historical document for future generations to reference. The MSM may be going for Whyte with all guns blazing, they may even go after Murray if the FTT goes against Rangers and its clear Murray will never be a factor at Rangers again.

     

     

    However what they will never do is go after Rangers for years of cheating. They will never call that aspect for what it is.

     

     

    We, as a Celtic community , will need to do that job. History and future generations deserve no less

     

     

    Paul67 knows he can call on me if this requires underwriting

  11. reilly1926 on 10 March, 2012 at 17:45 said:

     

    Celtic fan on Jabbas show saying he wants a competitive huns. Also states that he bought a Rangers(IA) dvd of 9IAR because Celtic were so crap during that time. Would any Celtic supporter ever contemplate such behaviour ?

     

    ========

     

    No ergo he isn’t a Celt in any shape or form.

  12. A HUGE article to be digested fully,later.

     

    Right now,just in the door & watching The Toffees v Spurs game,and I notice that the Bozo Burley has still got a job @ ESPN.

     

    I must be careful how I describe him….he is such a ( insert expletives here ).

  13. James Forrest is The Emperor of Ice Cream on

    “In fact it would be a great idea to have an entire edition of the magazine devoted to the subject.”

     

     

    You may, just may, get your wish my man haha.

  14. 67Heaven ... I am Neil Lennon..!!..Truth and Justice will always prevail on

    Jabba etc are telling us that everything is based on HMRC accepting a CVA, AND THEY THINK THEY WILL…….LOL

  15. 67Heaven ... I am Neil Lennon..!!..Truth and Justice will always prevail on

    Gloatfest sounds good when Jabba says it

  16. 67Heaven ... I am Neil Lennon..!!..Truth and Justice will always prevail on

    Bertha fae Bathgate now talking about refs

  17. jude2005 is Neil Lennon \o/ on

    So Judas pledged 5k. I pledged 5million just havent managed to get to the bank yet!! <0):)

  18. mic1888 says no to newco no to o*d f***m on

    obonfanti1888 on 10 March, 2012 at 17:37 said:

     

     

    me too

  19. Mark \o/ McGhee's \o/ Eyeliner \o/ AKA Mark Guidi on

    I doff my bunnett to to the Bunnett.

     

     

    Great article.

     

     

    Puts it all down there in black and white.

     

     

    I would rather we closed our club down with dignity than allow newco to walk straight back into the SPL and have the rest of them STEAL OUR money.

     

     

    Hail hail

     

     

    MME

  20. Philmac yesterday stated that an SPL board member has let it be known they are going to put Celtic ‘in a corner’

     

     

    When we dont go to their grounds we will see who is in a corner.

     

     

    I will say it again, if they think they are getting a slice of my season ticket money they are on to plums.

  21. ArranmoreBhoyLXV11 on

    A masterpiece Mr Bunnett.. Eloquent and factual.. Every football fan in Scotland SHOULD read it..

     

     

    Thank you…

     

     

    ArranmoreBhoy

  22. 67Heaven ... I am Neil Lennon..!!..Truth and Justice will always prevail on

    Soory, I can’t listen to this any more……am away to watch Joe Ledley’s ngoal again….then off to the 10 pin bowlig with the family, Pizza Hut first…..bye fellow Bhoys & Ghirls

  23. oglach

     

     

    They were told by Celtic/rangers not to accept Setanta deal but their short sighted greed won out.

     

     

    Now we have a shameful tv deal.

     

     

    It was their own fault!

     

     

    They get their hands on one penny of mine I will stop going to the games until they all die.

  24. Paul67

     

     

    Carried from the last thread.

     

     

     

    TinyTim on 10 March, 2012 at 15:37 said:

     

    Paul67

     

     

    “We must remain resolute and do everything in our power to escape from this sorry mess of a league.”

     

     

    I couldn’t agree more.

     

     

    However,do you believe that the Celtic board have taken any affirmative action to make this happen?

     

    Do they even share your opinion?

     

     

    TT

     

     

    share

  25. Woohooo for early kick offs.

     

     

    On way to by stylists today(number 4 top 2 sides and back) I popped into Bookies and picked

     

     

    Hearts ??

     

    Hibs 10/11

     

    Ross county 6/5

     

     

    “Sorry sir Hearts games has kicked off do you want to pick someone else”

     

     

    Aye Blackburn 8/5

     

     

    Hearts draw and i get 55 quid back for £5 bet.

  26. Sadly the call for any bhoycott will go unheeded by the ‘record / sun’ reading clowns who call on phone in shows and talk of needing ranjurs……

     

     

    The same shower who abused a manager heading for 4 in a row against the stacked deck of a cheating decaing empire…..

     

     

    This old media informed crowd of thickos purprting to be ‘celtic supporters’ will minimise the damage to the 10 and their project….

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. ...
  10. 23