Goal shyness hampers Celtic

880

Overall I was pleased with many aspects of Celtic’s play yesterday.  We dominated large parts of the game and got in and around the Hearts penalty area often enough to score the proverbial barrel load.

Hearts scored a good goal.  The flick from Beattie and run from Skacel were both exquisite, although a deflection off the blameless Kelvin Wilson was crucial.  Enough has been said about the second Hearts goal already.  Defensively we were good.

Midfield also played well, to a point, forcing Hearts into retreat for all but the opening 20 minutes of the second half.  Ki Sung-Yueng should have scored twice but he’s never been a player for back post headers and I was more surprised he found himself in that position than he missed both opportunities.  He is a player who continues to impress.

The question we should turn our attention to is why Celtic didn’t score more goals?

It is probably not an exaggeration to suggest Emilio Izaguirre is the best left back at the club in 30 years.  Skilful and intelligent in possession, Celtic look composed when he is on the field, but he’s being kept out of the team by a free transfer from Aberdeen because Charlie Mulgrew is manufacturing the most crucial item in the game – goals.

I’m close to advocating ‘Give the ball to Charlie’ tactics.  He has the ability to fire in remarkably dangerous crosses and has an instinctive awareness that the purpose of the game is to score goals.  Kris Commons shares this awareness but Kris has had a wretched season and is still rescuing his game from injury and early season loss of form.

In these circumstances, Neil Lennon cannot afford to play Izaguirre if it involves dropping Mulgew as this would severely hamper Celtic’s ability to put the ball in the net.  If the manager wants to use Emilio, particularly in Europe next season when retaining possession will be crucial, Charlie has to play left midfield.

Scoring goals is the primary responsibility of the strikers.  None of Celtic’s current crop are impressing at the moment, but we need to look further upstream first.

We have an outstanding original canvass painting of Neil Lennon available for purchase on eBay to kick start our summer charity fundraising. This year the beneficiaries will be Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research, Martin Chambers Foundation and The Neuroblastoma Alliance, Aberdour PS PTA, The Haven, Blantyre. The painting, by US based artist, Joseph Gormley, is an outstanding memento of our manager during these times.

Get bidding!

Buy a hard copy of CQN Magazine, issue 7, by clicking on the button below.  You can read online here.


Ship to:




Click Here for Comments >
Share.

About Author

880 Comments
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 13
  5. 14
  6. 15
  7. 16
  8. 17
  9. 18
  10. 19
  11. ...
  12. 24

  1. adi_dasler on 16 April, 2012 at 19:54 said:

     

    Racingbhoy

     

     

    And Martin O Neill meeting Leeds in a services station

     

     

    Oops £250k DR THANK YOU VERY MUCH

     

     

    share on F’book or Twitter

     

     

     Among other’s mate

     

    “paid a company to delete him from google”!!!

     

    AT must be at the airport shell shocked after sitting with those lunatics for 20 minutes.

  2. All SPL clubs are members of that league and aigned up to its rules. Those rules include a two year notice period for anyone wanting to leave.

     

     

    So what happens if the SFA sets up its own league and invites SPL clubs to join it?

     

     

    This could all get very messy.

  3. Neil canamalar Lennon hunskelper extrordinaire, 21:31

     

    Nothing groundbreaking but informative in how they have treated their loyal creditors by shafting them. Their is especially high comedy in one of the tales – the sort you go, no, that can’t be right?

  4. Whyte quoted “SFA are a farcical organisation” I will not be attending.

     

     

    He is telling the truth and has went up in my estimation. After the fantastic job he did at rangers , it would be great to have him replace Ogilvie at the SFA and bring it crashing down too.

  5. Gene's a Bhoys name on

    Keevins was a bit like – it isnae ma job mister i only deal with kickin a baw stuff- it must be thae big boys – an i coudnae say anything cos they’re bigger than me –

  6. Well was A T not a breath of fresh air tonight.Keevins and his sidekick were embarresing, C OGILVIE is holier than Mother Teresa was.the Plonker from Larkhall Hope A T does not think were all as thick as him.so called Celtic fans I ask you.how is it im a Celtic supporter and and dont go on to bash my team

     

    on radio phone ins gaving Clowns like Keevins amunition

     

    sorry spelling not the best K—— School Education

  7. Just listened to Alex Thomson on Clyde, hilarious stuff!! Had them well and truly pawned after 5 minutes LOL; Hugh Keevins and Roger Hannah will be awake for days in a cold sweat after that molligation!

     

     

    Funniest bit was when Thomson asked Hannah why he didn’t just Google Craig Whyte:

     

     

    “because he paid to have his google history deleted!!!” LMAO!!!

  8. bye bye rangers…

     

     

     

    THE Blue Knights group have pulled

     

    out of bidding for Rangers,

     

    administrators Duff and Phelps said

     

    tonight.

     

    The group was led by former Ibrox

     

    director Paul Murray and was

     

    responsible for one of three bids

     

    lodged to take charge of the club.

     

    David Whitehouse, joint

     

    administrator, said: “It is

     

    disappointing the Blue Knights are

     

    withdrawing at this stage,

     

    particularly in the view of the fact

     

    that last week it was made clear to

     

    them and Ticketus that their

     

    indicative bid placed them in a strong

     

    position.

     

    “We were therefore surprised that

     

    their offer to pay an exclusivity fee

     

    was withdrawn and although

     

    discussions over the exclusivity fee

     

    continued over the weekend, no

     

    agreement was reached.

     

    “At all stages of the process, The Blue

     

    Knights/Ticketus bid has been given

     

    the most serious consideration by us

     

    as administrators, particularly due to

     

    the fact that it was being encouraged

     

    by supporters’ groups.

     

    “We are aware that Ticketus has also

     

    been, at their own instigation, in

     

    parallel discussion with one of the

     

    other bidders over the last few weeks

     

    and it remains to be seen whether

     

    these discussions will be taken

     

    forward.

     

    “We can reassure supporters of the

     

    Club that we look forward to making

     

    an announcement on a preferred

     

    bidder later this week, assuming no

     

    further hurdles are placed in our

     

    path.

     

    “While we as administrators have a

     

    statutory duty to look after the

     

    interests of creditors and keep the

     

    business going, it is of paramount

     

    importance that the bid which is

     

    taken forward is the best on offer for

     

    Rangers Football Club.”

     

    A statement from the Blue Knights

     

    read: “On the evening of Thursday 12

     

    April The Blue Knights Consortium

     

    (“the consortium”) was asked by Duff

     

    & Phelps to reconfirm its “best and

     

    final” offer of 4 April. We

     

    reconfirmed our position and we

     

    believed that we would be awarded

     

    preferred bidder status on Friday

     

    morning.

     

    “As part of the process of awarding

     

    exclusivity Duff & Phelps had

     

    requested a non-refundable deposit.

     

    During the course of Friday Ticketus

     

    informed us that they were not

     

    prepared to provide this deposit.

     

    “During the course of the weekend

     

    individuals within the consortium

     

    offered to put up the deposit subject

     

    to a small number of conditions

     

    which were broadly agreed with Duff

     

    & Phelps.

     

    “During the course of the weekend we

     

    were also made aware that Ticketus

     

    had been in discussions with the

     

    Singaporean consortium who, on

     

    Friday, had offered Ticketus a

     

    “substantially” better deal to the one

     

    offered by us. We confirmed that we

     

    were not prepared to increase our

     

    offer to Ticketus which we believe to

     

    be in the Club’s best interests.

     

    “The consortium believes that the

     

    whole deal process has become

     

    incredibly complex and it is critical

     

    that a preferred bidder is appointed

     

    this week.

     

    “As a consequence, and in the best

     

    interests of the Club, the consortium

     

    has decided to take a step back to

     

    enable Duff & Phelps, Ticketus and

     

    the Singaporeans to conclude a deal

     

    as quickly as possible or not.

     

    “We stand ready to complete our offer

     

    of 4 April which included a deal in

     

    principle with Ticketus. We still

     

    believe that a partnership with

     

    Ticketus represents the best

     

    opportunity of the Club exiting

     

    administration via a CVA.

     

    “We firmly believe that, in the best

     

    interests of the Club, the whole

     

    process has to move forward as a

     

    matter of urgency. We are stepping

     

    back to assist with this but we stand

     

    ready to re-enter the process if a deal

     

    can not be reached.”

  9. Racingbhoy

     

    That was Jammy Rodger trying to dodge (get it ?) ATs retort about ‘why didnt any scottish jounalist try and find out about CW rather than accept all the B***s***

     

    and the I think I heard hugh comin out of the cludgie and askin if there was any more bog roll

  10. I think you can dupe a duper some of the time. But to think that Mister Sir david murray is also dupable – that’s just plain ole crazy talk, I’m talking crazy, stop talking crazy talk Uly.

     

     

    Undupeable surely…?

     

     

    U

  11. Gordon_J backing Neil Lennon on 16 April, 2012 at 21:27 said:

     

    Praecepta,

     

     

    What’s that phrase we keep hearing about not interrupting an enemy who is making mistakes?

     

    ________________

     

     

    TBB and I have batted League Reconstruction comments about for 12-18 months – why were the SPL constantly deferring a decision?

     

     

    All the talk about them ending up in SFL3 after the end-game is a ‘red herring’ – reconstruction will be about how quickly they can be managed back into the SPL1.

     

     

    Worst case scenario – take your pick? 12 + 2 x 14 or 3 x 14 (newco + 2 others to appease the dissenters). Punishment = 2 years max in wilderness.

  12. do you know it sickens me-the focus on the manager-considering whats going down-

     

    every dirty trick in the book is getting used by them all-eg the defence of campbell ogilvy as a good guy-he obviously isnt-he wont stand down and apart- from an investigation that is probably in part,about him- that reeks of arrogance and a fear that -if judged properly-hes guilty of something-i bet there has been much shredding going on-im waiting to here about missing documents-shredded-im expecting a whitewash-a sanitised outcome-im envisioning blue fans grinning at me-explaining to me how it IS-we have talked about the so called gorilla in the room

     

    -but personally-i-in fear-want to mention the invisible giant octopus-we all know its there-you are never far from its tentacles-but everybodies too scared to talk about it

     

    eg i think 2 out of 3 every night on clyde are cephalopods-plus its well known that ink is controlled by them too-i rest my case and plead sanity

  13. James Forrest is Neil Lennon! We are ALL Neil Lennon! on

    Snake:

     

     

    It seems to me, as Auldheid has already pointed out, that the Cheats Charter IS dead.

     

     

    I can put it in plain speak for anyone who finds this hugely complex. Actually, the matter is fairly simple.

     

     

    The SFA have their own “licensing criteria” as laid down by UEFA, for granting licenses to play domestic football.

     

     

    In order to play in the SPL a club must have a European license AND an SFA license, and these are non-transferable between legal entities. In other words, a NewCo would be ineligible as Rangers license cannot be simply handed over the title deeds to a house. The European licensing requirement to play in the SPL is explicit, because if an SFL club qualifies for Europe they have to be given a “special provision” by the SFA, who then need UEFA approval.

     

     

    The Cheat’s Charter is DEAD. That is a fact. The SFA’s talk tonight about a new league structure is EXACTLY what I told Stephen Black it was; the SFA reminding the SPL that everyone has to answer to the bosses in Nyon, and that any attempt to supercede SFA rules would meet with the SFA issuing an “invite” to all their member clubs to join a brand new league.

     

     

    Gentlemen, we have been debating where Celtic would go if the SPL voted for this grubby little back-door deal. We now have our answer.

     

     

    We would go nowhere. We would be the first club to endorse the SFA national league … and thus the SPL is dead, thank you, good night …. and so is the prospect of NewCo Rangers walking straight in.

     

     

    We now know this, almost beyond doubt.

     

     

    If Rangers is liquidated the NewCo will not be in the SPL.

  14. van persie throws dummy oot the pram cos he cannae score due to world class defender cauldenbaur….

  15. the long wait is over on

    og rafferty

     

     

    not asking you disclose anything confidential or that discloses your identity but if you do have any direct contact with AT and or the C4 team direct I do hope you can pass on the numerous comments of appreciation from on here (me included for what that’s worth).

     

    While I dont believe him to be godlike nor do I delude myself for a second that he’s doing this for our benefit the simple application of intelligence , journalistic professionalism and a willingness to call it as it is says huge amounts about him as a journalist.

     

     

    That it says even more about the MSM appears lost on them. I’d love to know what his private thoughts on them are.( That’s a rhetorical question btw!)

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 13
  5. 14
  6. 15
  7. 16
  8. 17
  9. 18
  10. 19
  11. ...
  12. 24