This is a dead football club

899

We are five days away from the end of the season, Duff and Phelps have spent 10 weeks trying to solicit an offer for the assets of the company and the only one they were in a position to consider has now been withdrawn.

The stadium remains in Craig Whyte’s hands.

The SPL has not offered a place in the league.

The players can choose to become free agents on Sunday.

Duff and Phelps have no money to pay anyone or anything after 31 May.

Are you getting the picture?

Whatever ‘good news’ Duff and Phelps come out with later, or ‘Rangers to benefit from Miller withdrawal’ you read about tomorrow, not one piece of positive news has gone Rangers way in weeks.

This is a dead football club. If there was an accountancy term beyond liquidation, perhaps uber-liquidation, they would be uber-liquidated (there’s not, but if this gets any worse the English language will need some re-work).

Yesterday’s delay was the most complete confirmation possible, for anyone still harbouring doubt, today’s message from Miller should be no surprise to Celtic Quick News readers.

Miller’s parting shot:

“After hearing the message from Rangers supporters and fans loud and clear (“Yank go home!”), I notified the administrators today that I have withdrawn my bid for Rangers”.

…has the makings of a topic for a business doctorate, if anyone is looking for one.  I’d elaborate but reckon we’re all a little carried away at the moment for serious debate.

The histrionics since yesterday and, if you don’t mind me saying, lack of appreciation of these historic times, would dishonour teenage girls (no offense teenage girls).

Please stop with all the silliness, indignation and faux trauma.  Some football supporters have real issues to worry about.

You can buy a hard copy of the new issue of CQN Magazine via Magcloud here.

The graphic below is just for a flick through, to read the magazine go here to it’s dedicated site.

Click Here for Comments >
Share.

About Author

899 Comments
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 7
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. 12
  10. 13
  11. ...
  12. 24

  1. The Comfortable Collective on

    What with all the discombobulation surrounding rangers, why don’t the administrators Duff and Feltch just put a deadline on any bids. This would surely end any unnecessary bamboozlement.

     

     

    Don’t know why they haven’t thought of it before.

  2. 'crushed nuts?' 'Naw, Layringitis!' on

    Bill Miller proves he’s a fit & proper person by walking away.

  3. What’s the appeal to a Tennessee businessman of buying Rangers Football Club when he knew very little about it?

     

     

    Apparently, it had to do with the prospect of the hair on Bill Miller’s arms standing up as he witnessed the passion at an Old Firm match.

     

     

    No, I’m not making this up. Bill Miller’s friends had told him this was one of the world’s great derby matches.

     

     

    But to own a half of said contest, and a lot of baggage that goes with it, is quite a price to pay for a bit of follicular stimulation.

     

     

    We know this was the attraction of owning Rangers because he has, at last, explained it. But he only did so at the end of the statement announcing he’s withdrawing as preferred bidder.

     

     

    He gives two main reasons for pulling out. One is that he’s had a closer look at the books, and they’re not quite as good as he was led to believe.

     

     

    “Preliminary information, discussion and analysis were, unfortunately, more optimistic than reality,” said the statement.

     

     

    Chattanooga poo-poo

     

     

    Given what was already public knowledge about Rangers’ books, and the business risks hanging over them, it stretches the imagination a bit to think they’re even worse than we’d thought.

     

     

    Or perhaps, viewed from Chattanooga, the enormity of the debts and the even more daunting complexity of sorting out the business while retaining Rangers’ sporting position had been, somehow, lost in translation somewhere mid-Atlantic

     

     

    That’s until Team Miller got beyond the limited information made available by Duff and Phelps, the Ibrox administrators, and the preliminary discussions with both the Scottish footballing authorities and team manager Ally McCoist.

     

     

    A bit more light was shed on this by Duff and Phelps, saying of Bill Miller “there were a number of issues with which he felt uncomfortable including legacy contracts, the limitation of potential revenue streams and the expectation of required investment”.

     

     

    Yankie doo-doo fan day

     

     

    That raises lots of questions about what’s meant. “Legacy contracts” could be the deal by which Craig Whyte last year raised more than £24m from selling three years of season tickets to Ticketus, the football finance firm based in London.

     

     

    Or that could refer to the deals to sell catering and hospitality rights, or perhaps players contracts.

     

     

    All of those contracts could be set aside if the company is liquidated. But of course, Mr Miller thought he had a cunning plan to avoid liquidation. It’s not looking so cunning now.

     

     

    But hark! News arrives of more explanation from one of Bill Miller’s US-based advisers, saying that “There are big legacy costs as a result of doing things poorly over a number of years – structural and commercial problems”.

     

     

    Bill Pritchitt talks of Mr Miller becoming “very unpopular, given the way things have operated”.

     

     

    It seems some at Ibrox hadn’t quite realised how much things needed to change, and were asking when the spending taps might get turned on again.

     

     

    He adds: “The second factor is some of the contingency liabilities: are the players coming or going? What are the final decisions with regard to the SFA and SPL and sanctions?”

     

     

    So “Potential revenue streams” probably refers to the blow from an exit from European competition for at least one year, and quite possibly more, or the threat that relegation to the third division would hit gate receipts and TV rights rather hard.

     

     

    And the “expectation of required investment”? Bill Miller had only briefly mentioned the working capital required to fund Rangers, beyond the £11.2m he offered to take over the club. No figure was mentioned.

     

     

    He was off the hook for one year of squad development, because registration of players is banned for a season. But the club was leeching £10m per season as it was, and that was going to require some deep pockets while he turned things around with what he called “fiscal discipline – no excuses”.

     

     

    Mr Pritchitt, chief executive of Club 9 Sports, which itself was previously interested in bidding said, tells us that, from Mr Miller’s point of view: “It would take a fairly large amount of money to keep it from dying”. And was it worth his children’s inheritance? Er, no.

     

     

    Then there was the other big reason for pulling out – the reaction Bill Miller received from Rangers fans, citing the “Yanks Go Home” message. This was the shortened version of several banners displayed at Ibrox last weekend, with references extending to “asset stripping Yanks”.

     

     

    Mr Pritchett says it went rather further than that, with hundreds of emails directed at him, some full of “vitriol and expletive-filled”.

     

     

    Miller says he heard the message “loud and clear”. So he’s taking his £11m from his lawyers’ bank account, to spend it elsewhere – presumably somewhere that sports fans are rather happier to see his investment, and local newspapers are less prying into his private life.

     

     

    Ibrox bonus bidders

     

     

    So where does this leave Rangers? Duff and Phelps say that, after Bill Miller was given preferred bidder status last Thursday, three other bidders came forward.

     

     

    Now, let’s be clear about this: we’re expected to believe that three different people or groups have watched Rangers for a year since Craig Whyte’s reign began, and for the three months since he put it into administration.

     

     

    And it was only last Thursday, when they saw a preferred bidder come forward, that they thought they’d like to have a go, and could find the money. That’s three bids. Seriously?

     

     

    It brings me back to the simple question that nagged away at the Bill Miller bid: why? Why would he want to take on Rangers, when he had no link to it? And why would someone else now want to do so, when the complexities and risks are so daunting?

     

     

    We know one reason why Duff and Phelps wants more bidders. It has a responsibility to creditors to maximise the value they can get from the debt they have with the club.

     

     

    With Bill Miller out, attention turns back to the Blue Knights consortium – led by former director Paul Murray along with Sale Sharks rugby team owner Brian Kennedy. But if they are the only ones left bidding, then they can lower their price.

     

     

    As they were reported to be bidding only £1.5m, that’s already impossibly low if a deal is to be done with creditors.

     

     

    Is it worth agreeing to one or two pence in the pound, or could there be more to be had from forcing a liquidation, and selling the assets in a firesale auction?

     

     

    That’s the conversation Duff and Phelps have to have with HM Revenue and Customs and with Ticketus, among others. And with the end of the season and of players’ temporary contracts looming large, they’re running out of time to find an answer.

     

     

    The creditors will want to know if these new bids are credible, just as we all do.

     

     

    They may also be asking about the credibility of Duff and Phelps in their management of this process. They’re looking ever more like Laurel and Hardy.

     

     

    Article written by Douglas Fraser

     

     

    Business and economy editor, Scotland

  4. sparkleghirl on 8 May, 2012 at 20:27 said:

     

     

    Graham Spiers ‏ @GrahamSpiers

     

    What a daft tool Bill Miller is. Rangers – as hopeless and undignified as this club now looks – are better off without him. Waste of space.

     

     

    <Angst, Petulance and Hysteria!

  5. was on the phone to my friend about an hour or so ago and kyle lafferty yes that

     

    one was in raffo’s chippy at the top pf the whiterock in the heart of west belfast

     

    ordering battered sausages i kid you not and my friend asked him what he was doing there and he replied he was with one paddy mcourt in the rock bar on the

     

    falls road having a drink with him,he swears to me its the truth.

  6. Above article by Douglas Fraser, BBC Business and economy editor, Scotland.

     

     

    Lubo

  7. Serious question.

     

     

    Will Duff and Duffer announce through a presser that they are winding the hun up.

     

    Or will it be something else ???

  8. 'crushed nuts?' 'Naw, Layringitis!' on

    All was going to plan ’til Bill saw the size of Swally’s Greggs’ bill.

  9. You’d have thought Willie miller would have enough on his hands with them chip shops in Aberdeen without bidding for rangers

  10. ‘crushed nuts?’ ‘Naw, Layringitis!’ on 8 May, 2012 at 21:50 said:

     

    Shared, mate. A cracker!

  11. macjay1 for Neil Lennon on

    Almost time to buy a Rangers top.

     

    Place in a prominent position in the home.

     

    A good laugh every time you pass it.

     

    Or ,maybe a wee shrine……….naw,that would be triumphalism

  12. midfield maestro on

    Anyone be kind enough to paste quotes from FPLG from last week, when King Bill was announced prefered bidder? Be interesting to hear what the fat wee sh*te thinks of him this week, probably never know, as nobody from MSM will have the balls to ask him.

  13. Wonkyradar im thinking of changeing from sky to virgin. im on a deal with sky till november 80 odd pounds a month full package etc etc ,how much with virgin ,broadband is supposed to be a lot faster.

  14. 'crushed nuts?' 'Naw, Layringitis!' on

    given Bill’s antics today, the story about D&P not cooperating with the bizzies has disappeared under the radar.

  15. Danso 1888 @21.51.

     

     

    Not the first time either, he was in the west club on the falls road at the end of last season, at that time he shared the same agent as naill mcginn and paddy mc court, strange times indeed!

  16. JimmyQuinnsBits on

    What are D&P up to, are they really just milking this for as long as they can? I understood their priority was to look after creditors interests? Or are they just incompetent?

     

     

    Anyway, I confess I’m beginning to like em

  17. West Wales Celt on

    Have really, really, really enjoyed Radio Snyde rewind tonight.

     

    Bit like a wake really. They’ve more or less given up hope, stopped looking for straws to clutch. Loving the pain boys, loving the pain…

  18. Paddy Gallagher on

    Panic at Rangers as ‘Yanks go home banner’ sees Edu, Bedoya and Bocanegra board flights to the USA , Kyle Lafferty also on board because he misread it!!

  19. ¡ǝsoɥ ǝɥʇ ǝɯ ssɐd ‘sʞɔıʞ ʎןɟ ɥbnouǝ (o) /o\ z ʍoɹ on

    The three new bidders revealed:

     

     

    Nitromors

     

     

    Ronseal

     

     

    B+Q Own Brand

     

     

    Yip, everyone an asset stripper!

     

     

    HH

  20. Douglas Fraser ‏ @BBCDouglsFraser

     

    Bill Miller adviser on #Rangers: “It would take a fairly large amount of money to keep it from dying.”

     

     

    Fairly large? As in Pavarotti is a fairly large man? Everest is a fairly large mountain? Kyle Lafferty is a fairly large waste of oxygen?

  21. ¡ǝsoɥ ǝɥʇ ǝɯ ssɐd ‘sʞɔıʞ ʎןɟ ɥbnouǝ (o) /o\ z ʍoɹ on

    Bill Miller cancels bid after wife uses imac on his arms whilst asleep:

     

     

    No hair raising on his arms so no bid

     

     

    HH

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. ...
  4. 7
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. 12
  10. 13
  11. ...
  12. 24