No David, Ive been a bit unwell since Saturday night…and I didnt get too much sleep last night, so I am taking more medication and trying to catch up on my sleep on the couch Today.
Nothing serious, but enough to make me feel quite sick etc.
Bankier saying “nothing” rather than “zero” is very annoying …not the biggest gripe this year granted
Joe Cundy on
My wife thinks its a nice carpet. That’s the major point to emerge so far.
Friesdorfer on
Res 9 carried
!!Bada Bing!! on
Ernie- VG
Friesdorfer on
Res 10 carried
Friesdorfer on
Now we get to it, Res 11…
notthebus on
Res 11..97.18% against
Friesdorfer on
Res 11 falls, what a surprise…
Por Cierto on
BIG JIMMY
Take it easy bud, get well soon, por cierto
Friesdorfer on
Bankier lying through his back teeth
ernie lynch on
Is this what The Bunnet had in mind when he talked about fan ownership?
Friesdorfer on
The Company (sic) have absolutely not pursued the matter. What about the interests of the Club, never mind the feckin Company. Sick, but unsurprised. No further spend from me.
Friesdorfer on
Best wishes Big Jimmy, take care.
YNWA HH
David66 on
Big Jimmy – Take it easy amigo.
Hail Hail
D :)
Por Cierto on
It’s most certainly not in the Company’s best interest to bring down its best money spinner, por cierto.
!!Bada Bing!! on
I think I could have a pint with the Kelly’s or the Whites, rather than Bankier….
Por Cierto on
Bankier “We’ve taken professional advice and engaged with interested shareholders.
“We understand our duties to shareholders. The requirement to consider the views of the shareholders has been at the forefront of the mind.
“Peter Lawwell raised this matter with the SFA in 2011 and 2012, before resolution 12 was raised in 2013.
“The matter has been reviewed by the board on a regular basis. I’ve reviewed this matter and I’m satisfied that at no time has anyone at the club mislead shareholders on this issue.
“The club called on the SFA to hold an independent review. The SFA declined to hold such a review.
“The club remains of the view that an independent review is the best way forward. In May 2020, the Scottish FA decided not to process proceedings.
“We all agree this situation is disappointing. Since 2011, the rules of the Scottish FA, SPFL and UEFA have developed and evolved.
“The rules as they stand today are considered to be fit for purpose. As members of the SFA and SPFL, we are one of many clubs who fully expect those rules to be applied fairly and transparently.
“The club has engaged with the relevant authorities as appropriate. The board will continue to act in the best interests of the company and will provide an update when possible.” por cierto
Por Cierto on
Bankier “Peter Lawwell stands out for me. He’s a natural decision maker. In terms of time, you never have any time. Everything is moving fast, and you need to make it right. Peter has an exceptional ability to do that. Everything he does, he does in the best interests of Celtic.
“In terms of the future of the club, we continue to do what we’ve been doing for the last decade. We are the custodians of this great club. Short-term pressures have come on, but we have to think of the longer game. Looking directly straight ahead, we need to get back to where we should be and we must do our very, very best to win this league. Everybody wants the same thing for Celtic and that’s where we stand.” por cierto
David66 on
I do not have a clue how these things work but can so many shareholders not put a vote of no confidence against any board member they see as not fit, example lying to other shareholders??
D :)
Por Cierto on
DAVID66 on 14TH DECEMBER 2020 12:31 PM
The overwhelming majority of shareholders, who have a vote, are people with a financial interest in Celtic, not an emotional one, unfortunately, por ceirto
“We understand our duties to shareholders. The requirement to consider the views of the shareholders has been at the forefront of the mind.”
Let’s see how many season tickets, pies, merch, TV subs etc that ‘shareholders’ can buy to fill the hole after the disenfranchised stakeholders/supporters tell your tier 3 to do one, Ian.
“Since 2011, the rules of the Scottish FA, SPFL and UEFA have developed and evolved…”
So force them to develop and evolve towards FFP and other issues that might force some accountability ffs!
jamesgang on
PL – ‘Top class professional club in everything we do’
1,006 Comments- Pages:
- «
- 1
- ...
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- »
Res 5 carried
0.72% against IB
Exciting isn’t it?
Were the bookies offering odds on any of these votes?
Res 6 carried
0.35% against SB
Res 7 carried
Formal business, same every year. All 9 res will be voted through with 99% of vote
DAVID66 on 14TH DECEMBER 2020 9:39 AM
Big Jimmy – You having a long lie this morning.
D :)
……
No David, Ive been a bit unwell since Saturday night…and I didnt get too much sleep last night, so I am taking more medication and trying to catch up on my sleep on the couch Today.
Nothing serious, but enough to make me feel quite sick etc.
HH Mate.
Res 8 carried
AGM ?……….Angry Group Members ?
LOL
HH.
Bankier saying “nothing” rather than “zero” is very annoying …not the biggest gripe this year granted
My wife thinks its a nice carpet. That’s the major point to emerge so far.
Res 9 carried
Ernie- VG
Res 10 carried
Now we get to it, Res 11…
Res 11..97.18% against
Res 11 falls, what a surprise…
BIG JIMMY
Take it easy bud, get well soon, por cierto
Bankier lying through his back teeth
Is this what The Bunnet had in mind when he talked about fan ownership?
The Company (sic) have absolutely not pursued the matter. What about the interests of the Club, never mind the feckin Company. Sick, but unsurprised. No further spend from me.
Best wishes Big Jimmy, take care.
YNWA HH
Big Jimmy – Take it easy amigo.
Hail Hail
D :)
It’s most certainly not in the Company’s best interest to bring down its best money spinner, por cierto.
I think I could have a pint with the Kelly’s or the Whites, rather than Bankier….
Bankier “We’ve taken professional advice and engaged with interested shareholders.
“We understand our duties to shareholders. The requirement to consider the views of the shareholders has been at the forefront of the mind.
“Peter Lawwell raised this matter with the SFA in 2011 and 2012, before resolution 12 was raised in 2013.
“The matter has been reviewed by the board on a regular basis. I’ve reviewed this matter and I’m satisfied that at no time has anyone at the club mislead shareholders on this issue.
“The club called on the SFA to hold an independent review. The SFA declined to hold such a review.
“The club remains of the view that an independent review is the best way forward. In May 2020, the Scottish FA decided not to process proceedings.
“We all agree this situation is disappointing. Since 2011, the rules of the Scottish FA, SPFL and UEFA have developed and evolved.
“The rules as they stand today are considered to be fit for purpose. As members of the SFA and SPFL, we are one of many clubs who fully expect those rules to be applied fairly and transparently.
“The club has engaged with the relevant authorities as appropriate. The board will continue to act in the best interests of the company and will provide an update when possible.” por cierto
Bankier “Peter Lawwell stands out for me. He’s a natural decision maker. In terms of time, you never have any time. Everything is moving fast, and you need to make it right. Peter has an exceptional ability to do that. Everything he does, he does in the best interests of Celtic.
“In terms of the future of the club, we continue to do what we’ve been doing for the last decade. We are the custodians of this great club. Short-term pressures have come on, but we have to think of the longer game. Looking directly straight ahead, we need to get back to where we should be and we must do our very, very best to win this league. Everybody wants the same thing for Celtic and that’s where we stand.” por cierto
I do not have a clue how these things work but can so many shareholders not put a vote of no confidence against any board member they see as not fit, example lying to other shareholders??
D :)
DAVID66 on 14TH DECEMBER 2020 12:31 PM
The overwhelming majority of shareholders, who have a vote, are people with a financial interest in Celtic, not an emotional one, unfortunately, por ceirto
DAVID66
99.5% of shareholder have voted for DD
So far an utter waste of time.
“We understand our duties to shareholders. The requirement to consider the views of the shareholders has been at the forefront of the mind.”
Let’s see how many season tickets, pies, merch, TV subs etc that ‘shareholders’ can buy to fill the hole after the disenfranchised stakeholders/supporters tell your tier 3 to do one, Ian.
“Since 2011, the rules of the Scottish FA, SPFL and UEFA have developed and evolved…”
So force them to develop and evolve towards FFP and other issues that might force some accountability ffs!
PL – ‘Top class professional club in everything we do’
‘Stronger together….’
Might as we have said Better Together!
PravdaCFC
Is there a link to watch the agm live?
decent draw for the huns; Royal Antwerp
https://www.celticfc.com/news/2020/december/Celtic-plc-AGM-video-interviews/
AGM now closed