We will never know the scale of sexual abuse in our institutions, or how far back in history they go; “historic” covers a lot of ground. What we know for sure is the lifelong damage caused by this abuse. Yesterday’s SFA review, apologies from clubs and the Association, and many criminal convictions, cannot repair the damage done, but it vindicates those who brought the issue to light.
It is hard to understand that the perpetrators walked among us, lived otherwise normal lives and held positions of respect. It could be decades before we know if the problems of the past persist today, such is the imbalance of power between abuser and victim. As a society, as families or as parents, we cannot be complacent. Boys clubs, churches and youth organisations were targeted in the past, but if these types still walk among us, and they almost certainly do, they will look where vigilance is less.
485 Comments- Pages:
- «
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- »
Makes false claims, provides no evidence and then attempts to discredit those who don’t agree.
Provide me a link to a credible source and I’ll read it.
From MHRA
Severe allergy
On 9 December 2020, the MHRA issued preliminary guidance on severe allergic reactions after the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine due to early reports of anaphylaxis. Following further detailed review, this advice was amended on 30 December to the current advice. This advice is that people with a previous history of severe allergic reactions to any ingredients of the vaccine should not receive it. People who receive the vaccine should be monitored for at least 15 minutes afterwards.
Widespread use of the vaccine now suggests that severe allergic reactions to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine are very rare (less than 1 in 10,000 people receiving this vaccine), and have been reported at a rate between 1 and 2 cases per 100,000 doses administered. Similar reporting was seen in the United States with the same vaccine. Anaphylaxis can also be a very rare side effect associated with most other vaccines.
Following very substantial exposure across the UK population, no other new safety concerns have been identified from reports received so far.
From MHRA
Conclusion
The increases in number of ADR reports reflects the increase in vaccine deployment as new vaccination centres have opened across the UK
The number and nature of suspected adverse reactions reported so far are not unusual in comparison to other types of routinely used vaccines
The overall safety experience with both vaccines is so far as expected from the clinical trials
Based on current experience, the expected benefits of both COVID-19 vaccines in preventing COVID-19 and its serious complications far outweigh any known side effects
As with all vaccines and medicines, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is being continuously monitored
Further information on the type of suspected adverse reactions (ADRs) reported for the COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is provided in Annex 1. It is important to read the guidance notes to ensure appropriate interpretation of the data.
ERNIE
Dont be a thicko.
But I have admit to being one too ,I dont know how to put links on here. If you can educate on this then you can have your link.
Hot Smoked
Apologies I have searched through the MHRA website and there is nothing on any Celtic player injuries
YORKBHOY
You continue reading and you will find the deaths.
YORKBHOY
Scroll down to “events with a fatal outcome.”
The MHRA has received 143 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in which the patient died shortly after vaccination, 90 reports for the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine and 3 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified. The majority of these reports were in elderly people or people with underlying illness. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccine played a role in the death.
BAMBOO on 13TH FEBRUARY 2021 12:50 PM
ERNIE
Dont be a thicko.
But I have admit to being one too ,I dont know how to put links on here. If you can educate on this then you can have your link.
###
OK I’ll bite.
Find the page.
Move your cursor to the web address.
Copy the web link.
Paste what you’ve copied on here.
If that’s not clear watch this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCYP0mPeDoU
Please don’t ask me how you follow the link.
Ernie..,
Link to what exactly? You have tried to lead us a merry dance through numerous tangents and down conspiracy rabbit holes. Not once have you stuck to any of these long enough to follow where we are at.
I have simply tried to keep us on track, we started discussing why the Chinese and Russian vaccines were overlooked for untried mRNA vaccines. You asked was it because they offered these on a non-profit basis, maybe you could provide a link to that halfwitted suggestion, where exactly did you get that, I’m still chuckling at that one.
Just know, I will not be providing any links to intransigent people who are stupid enough to accept MSM dictates as gospel.
If you chose to remain ignorant because you are too lazy to do any research for yourself good luck to you, don’t expect me to do the work for you.
I do my own research when I am offered information, that way I am not led or have any reason to blame other for forming my own opinion whether it’s right or wrong, I find I do follow the evidence and have a fair grasp on most of the things I research myself but sometimes the information available is skewed or hard to find, I then research who is behind the offered information that usually tells me if its worth reading or just propaganda. I doubt you even consider half those parameters so, it’s unlikely your opinion will change on much.
Yorkbhoy
Read that too.
Key note “The majority of these reports were in elderly people or people with underlying illness. ”
Yet we we were told earlier that this govt agency reported direct link to deaths from vaccine.
Just making things up. Dangerous lying individuals.
So here’s the trick, if they knew the elderly and people with underlying illnesses were likely to suffer severe side effects why did they administer them?
The idea was that the elderly and people with underlying illnesses would be first to be treated, what’s going on? Cull?
It’s doesn’t say they suffered side effects from vaccine, just that small number older people or ill people died.
Why treat the most vulnerable with untried methods when there are tried and trusted methods available?
Russian & Chinese methods are/where traditional methods for administering vaccines mRNA remains unproven.
BT sport dropped scottish football this season yet show live games from bundesliga 2.
I wonder what their viewing numbers were for live games in scotland last season as compared to this season in the german second tier.
Who watches bundesliga 2?
Sadly that tends to happen and was likely going to happen whether vaccine or not.
YORKBHOY on 13TH FEBRUARY 2021 12:51 PM
:-)))))
A nice wee chuckle amidst a sea of ;
You`re an idiot.
No I am not. You are the idiot.
No I`m not ad infinitum.
Jeeso – I have read the MRHA article, including the fatalities section – here is the actual text:
The MHRA has received 143 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in which the patient died shortly after vaccination, 90 reports for the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine and 3 where the brand of vaccine was unspecified. The majority of these reports were in elderly people or people with underlying illness. Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccine played a role in the death.
A range of other isolated or series of reports of non-fatal, serious suspected ADRs have been reported. These all remain under continual review, including through analysis of expected rates in the absence of vaccine. There are currently no indications of specific patterns or rates of reporting that would suggest the vaccine has played a role.
Sydney Devine RIP
Westcraigs – watch it on occasion to see Hamburg get pumped 👍😁🇮🇪
Apologies to blog, must make for a rubbush read, but had to call it out.
thats a magic game on bundesliga 2 , never miss a show
Fritz a grand old team to play for
CANAMALAR IT LOOKS LIKE OCD OBSESSION on 13TH FEBRUARY 2021 12:59 PM
‘Ernie..,
Link to what exactly? ‘
###
The one that Bamboo is endeavouring to provide, to vouch his/her claims.
####
‘You asked was it because they offered these on a non-profit basis,/
I asked you why product liability was restricted and whether it was because the product was being supplied on a not for profit basis. It’s not exactly a state secret that that is the reason. It’s partly why the EU roll out has been slow, because they were haggling over the issue. The argument is that if the suppliers are to accept liability they have to factor that risk into their pricing. If they don’t, they don’t, and no country has to take the product if that’s a deal breaker.
Here is a link with some of the background. Sorry it’s not from batshit mental conspiracy nut, just boring old Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-astrazeneca-results-vaccine-liability/astrazeneca-to-be-exempt-from-coronavirus-vaccine-liability-claims-in-most-countries-idINKCN24V2EN
The people who died were elderly or had underlying illnesses, that imply’s they might not have died if they had not been vaccinated.
A decision was taken that they were fit enough to take the vaccine, their current condition was goody here was no fear they would dies in the immediate future, else why waste a vaccine, then it follows the vaccine was the cause.
I suppose it’s like having a reference but not knowing how to use that reference as a source of information.
Boring old Reuter, remind us all about the origins of that organization, talk about bat hit crazy 😂
Meant to add – please note the conclusion regarding the non involvement of the vaccines in deaths – easy to be selective with the first few lines if you don’t read to the end.
My sleeve will be rolled up in anticipation, any thing that helps us get together again is welcome.
Cheers
Oh and it is from a batshit mental conspiracy nut, someone who believes novichok is a mild
Military grade nerve agent, really what’s a more batshit mental crazy conspiracy theory than that?
FAVOURITE UNCLE on 13TH FEBRUARY 2021 10:55 AM
HOT SMOKED on 12TH FEBRUARY 2021 8:45 PM
Favourite Uncle
I was just going to ask Auldheid about `The Mungo`. Would I have known him?
Don’t think so JIM. A nice quiet bhoy but destined for GREATNESS. Not your typical CALTON boy just as you were not a typical GARNGAD type. He was some player for someone who had only been KICKIN A BA for a year. Not a hothead or scrapper but NOT TO BE MESSED WITH just as PETER LAWELL found to his cost.
From earlier.
Sydney Devine Rip
https://youtu.be/-9-X2BQioSI
hh
Incidence of anaphylaxis – severe allergic reaction – following vaccination by mRNA vaccines:
Pfizer – 4.7 cases per million doses
Moderna – 2.5 cases per million doses
Research here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776557?guestAccessKey=b2690d5a-5e0b-4d0b-8bcb-e4ba5bc96218&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=021221
I like CQN as it is but on some days, I can see the benefit of having different links for different topics.
I have actually quite enjoyed the exchanges but I can see that further enlightment is unlikely, nothing will be resolved and repetition will reign.
So,time to prepare for the rugby.
Cheerio for now.
Steak an’ Kidney……
Deid?
FAVOURITE UNCLE
I DID SEE THAT AND THANKED YOU FOR IT !!!!!
HOT SMOKED on 13TH FEBRUARY 2021 12:33 PM
Frank Terry
`is embarrassing in its ignorance.`
Is it?
___
Yes. Yes it is.
TBB
Maybe I was a wee bit hasty with my `further enlightment ` comment :-)
I’m reminded of that Skinner / Baddiel sketch….the History Today fullas…….?
:)
Fav Uncle/auldlheid
F.U
you mentioned a Harry Haddock
was he the Clyde player circa 50s/60s
went onto running a painting & Decorating ?
jus wonderin.my bro done his apprenticeship
with guy of that name:-)
HH
Sydney Devine……..I liked him better when he followed Prince and changed his name to the artist formerly known as mince.